Skip to content

Conversation

sbc100
Copy link
Member

@sbc100 sbc100 commented Sep 10, 2021

@sbc100 sbc100 changed the title DynamicLinking: Specify new "dylink" section format DynamicLinking: Specify new "dylink.0" section format Sep 10, 2021
@sbc100 sbc100 requested a review from dschuff September 10, 2021 14:47
## The "dylink.0" Section

The "dylink" section is defined as:
The "dylink.0" is a custom section, the existance of which signals that the
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
The "dylink.0" is a custom section, the existance of which signals that the
The "dylink.0" is a custom section, the existence of which signals that the

@sbc100 sbc100 merged commit b4e70a8 into main Sep 10, 2021
@sbc100 sbc100 deleted the dylink.0 branch September 10, 2021 15:59
sbc100 added a commit to WebAssembly/binaryen that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2021
sbc100 added a commit to llvm/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2021
This format is based on sub-sections (like the "linking" and "name"
sections) and is therefore easier to extend going forward.

spec change: WebAssembly/tool-conventions#170
binaryen change: WebAssembly/binaryen#4141
wabt change:  WebAssembly/wabt#1707
emscripten change: emscripten-core/emscripten#15019

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109595
mem-frob pushed a commit to draperlaboratory/hope-llvm-project that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
This format is based on sub-sections (like the "linking" and "name"
sections) and is therefore easier to extend going forward.

spec change: WebAssembly/tool-conventions#170
binaryen change: WebAssembly/binaryen#4141
wabt change:  WebAssembly/wabt#1707
emscripten change: emscripten-core/emscripten#15019

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109595
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants